Rough Justice • Governing by Force • Regime Change • Starmer's Dilemma • Speaking Softly
01
Cuffed but defiant, Maduro faces US rough justice
▶
The image of a handcuffed but unbroken Maduro is used to criticize American "might makes right" justice. This is not about the triumph of law, but about "gangsterism as new geopolitics," where sovereignty is replaced by the right of the strong. The hidden motive of the operation is exclusively oil and money, not democracy or the war on drugs, confirmed by Trump's words that "we are in the oil business."
02
Trump won't find it easy to govern Venezuela by force
▶
The White House's optimism about quickly establishing control over Venezuela crashes against the reality on the ground: a power vacuum, armed gangs, and guerrillas. The hidden threat is a repeat of the "you broke it, you bought it" Iraq scenario, drawing the US into a long, expensive occupation. For oil companies, this means huge security costs and risks of infrastructure sabotage.
03
The Maduro ally now ready to ‘work together’ with US
▶
The instant reorientation of Delcy Rodriguez from anti-American rhetoric to cooperation with Trump demonstrates the cynicism of elite survival. The US is betting on "professional autocrats" capable of ensuring oil flow, ignoring the democratic opposition. The hidden logic is that Washington needs stability and resources, not democracy; Rodriguez, as a technocrat, fits this better than the ideological Maduro.
04
Starmer says he stands with Denmark in Greenland row
▶
The British PM's forced restraint regarding US actions in Venezuela contrasts with his support for Denmark on Greenland, exposing diplomatic weakness. Starmer tries to balance maintaining the "special relationship" with the US and adhering to international law, which looks like "pathetic mumbling." This undermines the UK's moral authority on the world stage and shows its dependent position.
05
The West must continue to speak softly to Trump
▶
European leaders and US allies are forced to adapt to a new reality where Trump acts like a "mafia boss," demanding loyalty and a cut. Confrontation is meaningless; the only path is soft power and persuasion through personal contacts. For Europe, this is a humiliating position of a petitioner trying to prove their usefulness to the hegemon.